Related Articles

8 Comments

  1. Pingback: The Green Marshall Plan – Abel Danger

  2. 2

    Kristin

    Touche’ – this is our US road map. Thanks Vicky for yet another informative & fascinating article. I wish it were fiction.
    Read a topic today on Electronic Health Records: https://www.medpagetoday.com/patientcenteredmedicalhome/patientcenteredmedicalhome/78301 Physican laments the futility of the “system”. Some of the commenters “get it”. “David Dayton” wrote “1. “Who” initiated the move from paper to digital records?
    2. “Who” benefited from that initiative?”

    PS – Vicky if you have an email blast alerts thingie, add me to your list!

    Reply
    1. 2.1

      Vicky Davis

      That was an interesting article. I’ve read several others before it by doctors asking the same questions and with the same complaints. They are under the mistaken impression that the EHR was intended to help them help their patients. The system is nothing of the sort. In fact, the plan is for doctors as front line providers with patients to be eliminated – replaced by Physicians Assistants and Nurse Practitioners. The computer will be the decision maker – diagnosis and treatment by chemistry with perhaps a doctor expert somewhere in the virtual world maybe reviewing the chart – like the IRS audits, random selection of a small sample. The PA’s and NP’s will be able to help if you come in bleeding but aside from that, they are pretty useless (IMO). But that’s the idea.

      The 2007 National Governor’s Association conference in with IBM and Mayo Clinic gave a presentation gives the real reason for nationalized, electronic medical records. It’s for medical research. The patients are no more important than lab mice.

      I know there is a way to set up an email blast but I haven’t looked into it. Maybe I’ll do that. What I can do in the mean time is to send you an email to let you know.

      Reply
  3. 3

    Peter

    19th October 1993, Bill Cinton committed himself to his climate change action plan beginnng on ‘Earth Day’. Earth Day was as far away as 22nd April, 1994. So he gave himself 6 months plus 3 days notice. The air in 2000 AD was to be as pristine as it was in 1990, which I would assume was not as clean as it should have been in 1993 as cars were being regulated more and more for cleaner motor emissions as time went by.
    Be that as it may, what is the signficance of the date Earth Day was inaugurated? That date being 22/4/1970.
    I am not that big a believer in coincidence and happenstance, so I believe there is more to it than just mere coincidence.
    The inauguration of Earth Day on 22nd April 1970, just happened to be 100 years to the day from Vladimir Lenin’s birth date on 22nd April, 1870. Curiosity, big deal, or just something else to store in the upstairs useless information file?
    Personally, I celebrate Vladimir Lenin’s birth day on ‘earth day’, by leaving all the electric lights on all night, while other ignoramuses regard it as a ‘lights out’ event for some unknown reason.

    Reply
    1. 3.1

      Vicky

      Peter, there are a lot of moving parts there on that page. The reports I linked to, the players and what they were doing is what brought us to where we are today. I guess it’s not an article that can be read simply – it has to be read deeply and thoroughly.

      Reply
    2. 3.2

      Vicky Davis

      Go back and look again. I added a couple of buttons linking to pages you can look at. Clinton and Gore engineered a coup d’etat on our country to transition power to the United Nations. They were working with China, Russia and the eastern bloc countries and NATO to do it. The objective? Global Governance through networked technology systems.

      https://web.archive.org/web/20040205141804/http://www.unpan.org/globalforums.asp

      Reply
  4. 4

    Peter

    Vicky. That Perestroika series was a revelation. It shows that boofhead politicians are not really with it. And when Mr Christopher Story tried to wise up Maggie Thatcher, she said she was not deceived at all, then added, “At least I hope not.”
    At least she allowed for the possibiity. So Lenin’s deceptions are working as designed, and nothing has really changed. Lenin’s statues remain standing all over Russia in their thousands – indicating no regime change at all. But was Lenin really that much of a master tactician?
    It would take someone more wise than Daniel, but less wise than Solomon, the two wisest men ever, to mastermind such a psychologically clever, yet diabolically deceptive and secretive sham. Nevertheless, an unknown shooter fired the shot, that ended the standoff, that was necessary to get the civil war going, brother against brother. That man knew how to use a match to start a bushfire. When silence stifled the Congress back in those early days following the Revolutionary war, a mysterious voice spoken aloud got things moving. I can’t remember the incident, but can retrieve it if needed. Get a few men to start clapping loudly, everyone will start clapping. Its like that. The psychology of the sheep. Just a matter of getting the herd (flock – I know) instinct going.
    I don’t think Lenin alone was that master. And Lee Harvey Oswald and Timothy McVeigh do not deserve their claims to infamy honours either.
    All these things are believed and swallowed hoaxes. And the hoaxer is no one man.
    You can fool all the people some of the time. And you can fool some of the people all of the time. But you can’t fool all of the people all of the time. It seems politicians belong in the second category. Anatoliy Golitsyn and Christopher Story have their eyeswideoopen don’t they?

    Reply
  5. Pingback: Harvard: Deep State and Inter Generational Wealth – Harvard Isn’t a University, It Is a Corporate Money-Making Machine – Abel Danger

Leave a Reply