The legal authorization for building the international system for the Americas began with the sovereignty sucking treaty signed with Mexico in 1983 by Ronald Reagan. Repealing the 1983 treaty would collapse a significant portion of that fifth column both within the governments (all levels) and the private sector as well. The second step would be to repeal annexes to the La Paz treaty including the free trade agreements with Canada. Canada’s climate and environmental collaboration in the Americas
The 1983 treaty established an international zone on both sides of the border with the EPA Administrator and her Mexican counterpart in charge of daily operations. Both administrators report to their respective State Department officials. Notice the border region extends from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific Ocean. That makes the region an international maritime jurisdiction. Body of Water to Body of Water.
Incorporation by Reference
Notice in the La Paz Treaty, this clause:
Recalling that the Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, proclaimed in Stockholm in 1972, called upon nations to collaborate to resolve environmental problems of common concern ;
The reference to the Declaration of the United Nations Conference in Stockholm, is an “incorporation by reference” into the La Paz Treaty. What that means is that the Declaration of the UN Conference on the Human Environment is included in its entirety into the La Paz Treaty.
Maurice Strong
Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment and Action Plan. UN History.
Background on the Conference in 1972 and 1992 is found on the UN’s Audiovisual Library of International Law. Maurice Strong of Canada was the Secretary-General of the Conference. Kurt Waldheim was the Secretary-General of the UN. In 2012, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) published a 40th Anniversary Report that includes the founding of UNEP which stemmed from the Stockholm Conference. Maurice Strong was appointed to be the first director-general of UNEP. (Pg. 21 pdf).
Freedom of Transit
The misapplication of the principle of Freedom of Transit under international law was used to essentially turn the 50 states of the continental United States into sovereign, independent mini-countries for commerce – realigning loyalties between business and citizens. Businesses loyal to money. American citizens loyal to America – except for those working for the traitors loyal to money.
The stated purpose of the treaty was for a cooperative effort to clean up the environment in the border region. The treaty was written as an open-ended framework treaty that could be modified by agreement of the parties. The parties to the treaty could request assistance from anybody – any groups they wanted – including international organizations, the UN, NGOs, etc. Read the treaty carefully because it was this treaty that enabled the fifth column to be built and embedded in our government and to operate around this country.
Does the fifth column have immunity for their actions?
UN Employees – Immunity added to UN Charter, 1946-47
Applying Derivative United Nations Immunity to Humanitarian NGOs
Justice Department backs UN claim relief workers accused of aiding Hamas are immune
La Paz to Border XXI
Initial Workgroups – joint cooperative effort
(1)water, (2) air, (3) hazardous and solid waste, (4) pollution prevention, (5) contingency planning and emergency response, and (6) cooperative enforcement and compliance.
Added Workgroups
(7) environmental information resources, (8) natural resources, and (9) environmental health.
Environmental Health is Public Health
HHS Global with State Department Oversight
The internationalization of domestic HHS agency was enabled by the La Paz treaty. That treaty was a framework agreement. The loose language enabled the expansion of responsibility from the international zone on the border to the entire U.S. This is how the fifth column was built and embedded in our domestic government.
Public Health which was an obscure branch of military was embedded into the HHS organizational structure.
Click HERE to see the full page
This page shows that the State Department doesn’t represent American interests. Rather, they represent global interests with the United States being just a territory in their global domain. To be succinct, they are a parasitic, insurgency masquerading as an agency of the American government. Because the State Department is charged with the mission of international affairs, they are the authority over the international, fifth column insurgency established by the La Paz treaty and other international so-called trade (harmonization and integration) agreements. The Secretary of State is appointed by and works for the President, this is the means by which the imperial presidency was created and why he seems to rule by fiat.
Look at this page from 2008: HHS-Global Health.Gov Americas Region
President’s Council on Sustainable Development
Border 2012
SPP – March 23, 2005, CRS Report: Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America: An Overview and Selected Issues
Hemispheric Cooperation
March 31, 2006, President Bush gave a progress report on the Security and Prosperity Partnership announcing the establishment of the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), North American Emergency Management, Avian and Human Pandemic Influenza, North American Energy Security, American Smart, Secure Borders.
Security and Prosperity Partnership
April 22, 2008 – In New Orleans, Louisiana, President Bush met with President Felipe Calderón of México and Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada, to review progress under the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) of North America. Afterwards, the three leaders had a meeting with the North American Competitiveness Council. Among the achievements of the SPP has been the completion of the North American Plan for Avian and Pandemic Influenza, and the exchange of technical liaison staff between the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Public Health Agency of Canada.
United States-Mexico Agreement on the Environment in the Border Area
La Paz Treaty
Sister Cities
Sister Cities – History – Eisenhower
USAID – Integrated Environmental Plan for the Mexican-U.S. Border – First Stage: 1992-1994
UN Economic and Social Council
E/CN.4/2003/85/Add.3
30 October 2002
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Item 14(a) of the provisional agenda
Human Rights of Migrants
UN OCHR – Human Rights Documents READ THEM!
E/CN.4/2003/85/Add.3
Page 7, pdf II Legal and Institutional Framework of the Human Rights of Migrants
15. The United States has ratified international agreements that protect the human rights of migrants, in particular the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. The Special Rapporteur invites the United States to withdraw its reservations to those agreements that affect the human rights of migrants. The United States has signed the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child as well as the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and its two Protocols. The Special Rapporteur encourages the United States to ratify those instruments.
U.S. State Department
Joint Communique, Office of the Spokesman
Washington DC, June 22, 2001
U.S. –Mexico Migration Talks And Plan of Action for Cooperation on Border Safety
“Guanajuato Proposal”
USAID – President’s Communique, Bush and Salinas de Gortari, Monterrey Mexico
Border 2020 after Border 2012 (2013-2020)
Border 2020 – Environmental Program Summary
EPOCH TV Report: Border Deception: How the US and UN are Quietly Running the Border Crisis Documentary
Capture of Humanity
