After months of silence about the shooting at the Mandalay Bay, Sheriff Lombardo gave a surprise press conference to announce that he would be breaking protocol by releasing a preliminary report that includes a timeline on the shooting, photographs, etc. What was clear in the press conference is that he was trying to narrow the scope of the event to focus only on Stephen Paddock. He stressed several times that Stephen Paddock was the only shooter. He killed 58 people and the FBI’s behavioral analysis group is working very hard to figure out why he might have done such a thing.
Sorry Sheriff. We’re not buying it.
Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal and the Mandalay Bay connection
In an article dated November 5, 2017, Intellihub’s reporter Shepard Ambellas revealed that the Saudi-based private military company ETS Risk Management was on the ground in Las Vegas before, during and after the October 1st attack that occurred at the Mandalay Bay hotel.
On November 4, 2017, CNBC reported the arrest of Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal in an article titled, Billionaire Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal arrested in corruption crackdown. This article reported:
The billionaire is an American-educated philanthropist and investor who is heavily invested in U.S. corporate giants like Citigroup, Apple, 21st Century Fox and Twitter, just to name a few. Between 1991 and 1995, bin Talal came to the rescue of President Donald Trump, whose real estate empire was under strain. Bin Talal purchased a yacht, and invested in Trump’s Plaza Hotel.
Saudi Royalty Arrests Rock Clinton-Obama Regime
At a website not previously known to me, an article includes information linking Obama-Clinton and the DNC to the Saudis that the mainstream media seems to have missed 🙂
Quoting Medea Benjamin (Code Pink):
If I told you that Democratic Party lobbyist Tony Podesta, whose brother John Podesta chairs Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, is a registered foreign agent on the Saudi government’s payroll, you’d probably think I was a Trump-thumping, conspiratorial nutcase. But it’s true.
The lobby firm created by both Tony and John Podesta in 1988 receives $140,000 a month from the Saudi government, a government that beheads nonviolent dissidents, uses torture to extract forced confessions, doesn’t allow women to drive, and bombs schools, hospitals and residential neighborhoods in neighboring Yemen.
A couple of days ago in research unrelated to the Las Vegas shooting, it was discovered that Al-Waleed Bin Talal was an investor in the Carlyle Group. In 2004, a video titled Iron Triangle: Carlyle Group Exposed was published on the internet by the InformationClearingHouse. The first minute and a half are in Dutch. After that, it’s all in English. The story of the Carlyle Group is central to understanding what follows.
The Globalist Scheme of Things
In the globalist scheme of things, national governments were becoming obsolete in the modern world of international travel, international telecommunications, international business. In their delusional vision of utopia, borders and national laws were a hindrance to business that needed to be done away with – setting the people of the world free. The whole purpose of the Generalized Agreements on Trade (GAT) and then GATS – adding services was to create a body of international commercial law which would open up the world for corporations to exploit the resources and the people of the world.
The one barrier to this utopia was the Soviet Union and the Cold War. Throughout the 1980’s the U.S. had dual objectives – privatization of government functions – shrinking government in preparation for dissolution at the same time they were negotiating with the Soviets under the Helsinki Agreements to end the Cold War – which was complete with the destruction of the Berlin Wall and the reunification of Germany in 1990.
The purpose of the military is to serve as protection for the nation-state. In the thinking of the Utopian Globalists, the need for a military was going away but there was a plan to re-purpose the people of the military towards civilian jobs in civil defense and to re-purpose the defense contractors towards civilian applications of technology in the areas of telecommunications, transportation technology, energy technology, environmental technology, health technology and education technology.
Everybody knows you can’t teach an old dog new tricks but for some reason (betrayal, treason) they thought they could re-purpose the pit bulls (military and defense contractors) into building utopia. So what did they do? They weaponized our infrastructure and turned our police into paramilitary soldiers. The tech corporations were ecstatic about that because of all the money they would be making on the technology to imprison the civilian population.
So how does the Carlyle group fit in? Investments in Infrastructure. The following two videos are excerpts from the Iron Triangle video above. The entire video is important obviously, but these two clips are especially important.
Baghdad Bush and The Real Story
The Offset Kickback
There is a lot bigger story here that all begins in 1990 and continues till today. 1990 was the turning point putting the U.S. on the path to self-destruction. The fate of our nation is not at all assured and in fact, it feels like we’re hanging on by our fingernails. In a paper I wrote in 2011 called The Trinity: Policy, Philosophy and Mechanism, I included a quote from a paper written in 1941 by CH Douglas titled, The Big Idea:
There is perhaps no more convincing single piece of evidence in regard to the existence of conscious, evil, forces energising a continuous policy, than the strenuous and skilful endeavour to present a picture of events and of history, as purely episodic. History is crystallised Politics, not disconnected episodes.
What happened in Las Vegas at the Mandalay Bay hotel is not just an event, it’s the result of a continuous policy that is discover-able for those who have the curiosity and the desire to see the bigger picture.
It is truly amazing how any one person could retain this much information in their mind and synthesize it into one article which logically links all components together. (If you doubt this, look at the references cited in the “About the Author” section which went into this one article.) Even the “composite” article is quite complicated and may be hard for people to follow. Nevertheless, for the average person going through everyday life, we encounter many things which happen almost every day which make no sense to us, and make many or most of us angry. But even for the few who do understand, what do we do about it? That is the 64 dollar question!
Mr Fletcher that’s what I just adore about Vicky. She can take all of this in and manages to translate it all – like the Univac computer in “Desk Set”, she comes to conclusions.
About this sentence “…skilful endeavour to present a picture of events and of history, as purely episodic” I have been trying to convince people of this, that these current and former events in the news are all connected. You can kind of figure out most of it just by looking at the ends, you know, not the means but the ends. Ask Who Benefits as in follow the money. What has helped me greatly is just reading United Nations own websites. You have to be very wary of their double speak, and you will need some kind of thesaurus that defines their words vs how we, or a dictionary would define them. They use this language trick to keep us in the dark yet simultaneously claiming that they didn’t hide anything, it’s out there in the open. For instance, what does “Empowerment” mean? What does “Women’s Health” mean? and so on. When you read the UN’s goals, you can pretty much figure out the why where and how’s of things- the smart cars, smart highways. Refugees and immigration. UN wants free, open borders AND what they call “income equality” ahem. So, there’s your refugee question right there. The media keeps pushing this agenda as being motivated by potential future Democrat voters! I don’t buy it for one second. It’s about income equality- that is, world’s poorest (read: dumbest/most unskilled most uneducated) getting some of our First World money. UN wants everyone on the same playing field that is everyone impoverished and a select group at the top, doing all the heavy lifting via their giant brains. See, our brains are too small leave the big thinking for them. And they want everything controllable trackable and so on, there’s this Technocracy question answered. They want all the rural areas kept free from human beings. I think they are responsible at least in part for the California fires. Here is an unpopular suspicion of mine- that the UN is responsible for 9/11.
So you hold that ‘all men are not created equal’ which is in complete disharmony with what your Constitution holds.
Therefore, it should be asked, who wrote this into the Constitution from the outset, so that it comes in useful for today, to put all people on an equal footing paywise and possessions wise. Some elevated beyond their wildest dreams, others relegated to seeming poverty by comparison.
A lot of give and take going on there.
Still waters run deep, and it seems this has been in the offing for a long time. Noble words laced with arsenic, for when the time comes.
The time is today. In earlier days Americans fell for its noble deceptions and will pay for it today.
Peter, the Constitution is a framework for law. All men are created equal UNDER THE LAW. Only a lunatic would claim that all people are equally endowed by their created with personal – physical and intellectual attributes.
We do have a lot of lunatics in this country – mostly in the systems of education and politics.
Yes, that is found in the 14th Amendment where all states must apply the equal protection of the law to all (my words).
But the idea that all men are created equal was written by Thomas Jefferson in The Declaration of Independence, conferring on all men, life, linerty and the pursuit of happiness. This owner of more than two hundred slaves, must have include the word liberty with some kind of amusement.
Nevertheless, thanks for the correction.
US District Court Judge Arenda L Wright Allen in Eastern Virginia got it wrong too.
From other googled bits of information it comes across that the American Constitution is somehow supposed to enshrine the ideas of the Declaration of Independence.
“The Declaration of Independence, . . . . Set forth the ideas and principles behind a just and fair government, and the Constitution outlined how this government would function.”
The solution is outside of this arena. But you are getting the right dope and asking the right question. When the answer that exists is found, a few can be a potent remedy.
Pingback: The Bigger Picture of Mandalay Bay – Abel Danger
The Pingback article repeats most of this with the author as Vcky Davison. I left a corrective comment.
The ‘crusade weapon’. Says everything.
I’ll mention it to him. He’s a long time friend. He used to re-post the entire article but now just posts part of it with a link back.
Peter, Thomas Jefferson was not conferring a damn thing on anybody. The Declaration of Independence was declaring the principles and the objectives of declaring their independence from the crown.
My memory is a little hazy, but wasn’t Australia settled by Crown prisoners? And weren’t those prisoners put to work in the service (of the Crown until their sentence was complete? That was slavery.
Also, the Royal Navy would simply kidnap men they found on shore and put them to work on their ships. That was slavery.
In Africa and the Middle East – that’s where the slave trade originated I believe.
When the United States was settled, there was slavery ALL OVER THE GOD DAMN WORLD. It was not a phenomenon unique to America. Even the Indians of North America would capture members of other tribes and would make them slaves.
As you might have guessed by now, I’m pretty sick and tired of hearing about slavery. There is no a person in the United States living today who lived under the system of slavery. We fought a war to end it.
It ended. It’s over – except in the Middle east where it is coming back. If you have comments and criticisms about slavery perhaps you should find a Middle Eastern website and complain to them about it.