If there has been a single family that has had more influence and done more damage to this country than the Rockefellers, I don’t know who it would be. In a U.S. State Department history of the founding of the United Nations is written:
“The delegations negotiated a role for regional organizations under the United Nations umbrella and outlined the powers of the office of the Secretary General, including the authority to refer conflicts to the Security Council.”
According to Nelson Rockefeller’s Senate biography, he was responsible for the inclusion of United Nations recognition of regional pacts inherent in which is the regional organization assigned to oversee the regional pact.
“He played a key role in hemispheric policy at the United Nations Conference held in San Francisco, developing consensus for regional pacts (such as the Rio Pact and NATO) within the UN’s framework.”
By now, most people should understand that U.S. trade policy was not intended to improve the economy of the United States – quite the opposite in fact. Trade policy was used to build a harmonized system of law in the U.S. corresponding to the body of international law that was being built. Concessions in trade agreements that caused entire industries to move out of the U.S. were designed to buy approval for the international law system under the United Nations. Every international agreement that was ratified by the U.S. Senate on issues to be decided under international law transferred U.S. sovereignty to international bodies. It also transferred governing and oversight domestically to the U.S. State Department because they are the agency that oversees and enforces international agreements.
In 1983 the Senate ratified a treaty with Mexico known as the La Paz Treaty (TIAS 10827) that created a geographically defined border region under the management of the Environmental Protection Agency under the authority of the State Department because the State Department oversees and enforces international agreements. This treaty put that territory for the entire length of the border with Mexico under international law. In 1986, the U.S. added an annex to the La Paz Treaty concerning the transboundary movement of hazardous waste. They also negotiated and got a treaty with Canada on the same subject (TIAS 11099). The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) included the 1983 La Paz Treaty and the 1986 Treaty with Canada as Annexes which means they were incorporated into the agreement in their entirety.
What this did was to put the entire North American continent under international law under the management of the State Department as the agency to oversee international agreements. The NAFTA agreement had to do with the economy and the two other treaties had to do with the environment. Since everything we do is within the definition of the environment, sovereignty over our lives was effectively transferred. (More info on this can be found here: Puppet Regime).
In 1994, the first of a series of summits was held to finalize the treason that has been in progress since 1945 with the creation of the United Nations. The objective of the summits was to create the Free Trade Area of the Americas which is really a euphemism for ‘common market’ which – following the pattern of the European Union would end with creation of the North American Union – a region under international law. What that means is the end of sovereignty of the United States as a nation-state with governing authority transferred to an unelected regional commission unseen and unknown to the American people.
The FTAA summits were:
1994 – Miami Summit of the Americas
1998 – Santiago, Chili Summit of the Americas
2001 – Quebec City, Canada Summit of the Americas
Of course the whole thing was managed by the U.S. Trade Representative’s office along with the State Department because anything having to do with international affairs falls under the purview of the State Department.
Succinctly, what they’ve done has been treason on the installment plan – putting the United States into a regional “governance” system under the United Nations system.
United Nations Regional Commissions
UN Reporters *flashing red signals and sirens – recalling Ted Turner and his billion donation
Regionalization under the United Nations System
On December 14, 1960, the United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 1514:
Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples
A paper written by International Law Professor Edward McWhinney published on the United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law provided background and analysis of this Declaration. The Declaration was put before the General Assembly rather than the Security Council so that the veto power of the permanent members was not applicable. In effect, this was a coup d’etat on the permanent members by the majority of member countries occurring as Professor McWhinney wrote, on “cultural and ideological terms”. Since the United Nations operates as an association under international law, the Declaration provided the opportunity to use the international courts and their armies of non-governmental, civil society organizations to begin breaking down the Westphalian nation-state system. In 1960, the Declaration was like a hairline crack in a sidewalk. Over time, the entire sidewalk will crumble away to dust and debris and that is exactly what is happening to the United States.
Regionalism and privatization of government functions were marketed to the American people as being good economic policy and efficiency of government operations. Regionalism was promoted through what was falsely presented as trade agreements when all evidence indicates the real objective was to transfer economic sovereignty to unelected commissions under international law. The privatization of government functions using federal tax money to disempower the states and elected government officials has been used to transfer governing power to unelected groups of people creating a fourth column of operatives ready to aid and abet a fifth column occupation of the country in the final phase of de-colonization. Towards that goal, the U.S. State Department, acting as an agent of a foreign power in conspiracy with the networks of the fourth column is engaged in massive importation of tribal peoples hostile to western civilization and the Westphalian nation-state system who are the fifth column deceptively being described as “refugees”.
On September 25, 1961 President John F. Kennedy gave a speech at the United Nations calling for the complete disarmament of the United States and the Soviet Union. The Congress dutifully passed Public Law 87-297, “Arms Control and Disarmament Act”. The U.S. State Department released Memorandum 7277 explaining the United States introduced at the Sixteenth Assembly of the United Nations, a program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World.
It’s not a stretch to think that the logic of disarmament with legislation passed that close to the 1960 United Nations Declaration on De-Colonization was taken as a step towards the dismantling of the lawfully constituted American government. The military is the protection for the nation-state and the people of the nation. Disarmament removes that protection. The last line of defense is the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms and that right of the people under our lawfully constituted government has been under attack for decades.
We, the majority of the American population have been at a disadvantage because we don’t have a common understanding of history. It’s time to remedy that and it’s absolutely imperative that we do.
Brilliant work as usual Vicky.
Thank you Jim 🙂
“We, the majority of the American population have been at a disadvantage because we don’t have a common understanding of history. It’s time to remedy that and it’s absolutely imperative that we do.” Just listened to some news program/show “Hear It Now” 1950/51 era on the “old time radio” lists, one of the shows was on the Kefauver crime hearings. Tammany Hall politics was referenced. People need to read about this, if they don’t have time to read, there is audio of many programs on archive.org and the otrrlibrary.org.
Young people will not learn or hear about it in school, public or (most)institutes of higher learning. Libraries now only carry “Young Adult” Teen Romance, Self Help, Graphic Novels; Gaming. The best library Ive ever visited was in a tiny town of Ocean Shores, WA pop 6500, and they include the seasonals in that number, so its probably pop 3000.
and Cooking. Libraries have removed all books printed in 1983?’or 82? and earlier, something about “lead” or ? I know it had something to do with purported health, and I recall the story about it being on the news, then a week later it was on the 3rd page of listings on search engines when I went to go look it up again, now I cannot find proof of this online easily, as the engines muddying the waters. I know this is a fact, I bet if I were to ask a librarian, they probably will contest this claim. I know, I know this is documented some where.
they don’t *want* you to study history, or know it, or want to know it, and that is why it is made boring for children in schools (colleges too) Textbook nonsense.:
http://www.textbookleague.org/ttlindex.htm#ahist-hsb It’s old, but still relevant, as the same crap is produced even today by the very same crappy publishers. It is a rather humorous site.
This comment was not meant to change the topic at all- but I do find it extremely interesting that practically zero emphasis of US education is on history, US history specifically, Charlotte Iserbyt has her own website on this topic.
For what it’s worth, I personally would find anecdotes from US history of interest, until I discovered channelingreality and this site, I did not find US history, geopolitics and politics in general interesting at all. Now it’s fascinating.
Dating back to the League of Nations and the Committees of Intellectual Co-Operation, they decided that all history should be removed from text books that could possibly cause animosity between countries and peoples. A guy named James Shotwell, professor at Columbia University was on one of the committees (also Council on Foreign Relations) initiated movement to rewrite history in the U.S. In 1934, the Commission produced a report, Investigation of the Social Studies Schools. I haven’t read it but this is when the U.S. stopped teaching real history and started teaching social studies. I found out about the report from Charlotte Iserbyt. The League of Nations and Committees of Intellectual Co-operation, I found myself when I was researching the CFR and League of Nations. btw… Carnegie built a lot of libraries in this country. It wasn’t philanthropy. It was so that he’d have a place to put his subversive internationalist materials.