Regional Integration – National Disintegration
What was the 1983 La Paz Treaty with Mexico? North‐South regional integration.
What was the 1986 Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste Treaty with Canada? North‐South regional integration. Excerpt – recognizing international law in connection with environmental issues:
REAFFIRMING Principle 21 of the 1972 Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, adopted at Stockholm, which asserts that states have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their won resources pursuant to their own environmental policies and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other states or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction;
For the purpose of this Agreement: (a) “Designated Authority” means, in the case of the United States of America, the Environmental Protection Agency and in the case of Canada, the Department of the Environment.
NAFTA Agreement (Excerpt) – North‐South regional integration
BUILD on their respective rights and obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and other multilateral and bilateral instruments of cooperation.
Article 101: Establishment of the Free Trade Area The Parties to this Agreement, Consistent with Article XXIV of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, hereby establish a free trade area;
Article 104: Relation to Environmental and Conservation Agreements
1. In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the specific trade obligations set out in:
(a) the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, done at Washington, March 3, 1973, as amended June 22, 1979,
(b) the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, done at Montreal, September 16, 1987, as amended June 29, 1990,
(c) the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, done at Basel, March 22, 1989, on its entry into force for Canada, Mexico and the United States, or
(d) the agreements set out in Annex 104.1,
such obligations shall prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, provided that where a Party has a choice among equally effective and reasonably available means of complying with such obligations, the Party chooses the alternative that is the least inconsistent with the other provisions of this Agreement.
2. The Parties may agree in writing to modify Annex 104.1 to include any amendment to an agreement referred to in paragraph 1, and any other environmental or conservation agreement.
Bilateral and Other Environmental and Conservation Agreements
1. The Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America Concerning the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste, signed at Ottawa, October 28, 1986.
2. The Agreement Between the United States of America and the United Mexican States on Cooperation for the Protection and Improvement of the Environment in the Border Area, signed at La Paz, Baja California Sur, August 14, 1983.
The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal was the link for the bilateral and trilateral environmental agreements to come under the authority of international law in a step‐by‐step strategy of turning our government into merely a puppet regime of an international system of environmental law directed by international communists of the United Nations ‐ aided and abetted by their U.S. embedded counterparts. The U.S. Senate ratified the Basel Convention in 1992. The retention of sovereign rights domestically was meaningless because of the design and structure of the EPA and CEQ through the implementation of NEPA. By way of example:
When the NAFTA Agreement was passed by Congress in 1993, what that did was to consolidate the La Paz Treaty with Mexico and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and the Basel Convention for international law jurisdiction to complete the hangman’s noose for the American system of government.
In 1994, the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) was formed. The Council is the CEC’s governing body and is composed of the highest‐level environmental authorities (cabinet level or equivalent) from Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The Council oversees the implementation of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) and serves as a forum for the discussion of environmental matters within the scope of the Agreement.
The CEC is an intergovernmental organization located in Montreal, Quebec. The charter for them is the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation. It’s not clear that the Congress ever voted on it – or that it would be necessary for them to vote on it because the authority for it was in the La Paz Treaty – and NAFTA agreement. Excerpts:
Notice the last clause – REAFFIRMING the Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment of 1972 and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development of 1992;
If you’ve been following along – understanding the content of the agreements from the La Paz Treaty forward, you should be able to see that the CEC is the real government in the shadows and the people who present themselves as representing the American government are impostors working as puppets in a puppet regime.