Regional Integration – National Disintegration
Step 1
What was the 1983 La Paz Treaty with Mexico? North-South regional integration. The purpose of the treaty was for environmental cooperation in the border region. It was a plan conceived by the Socialist International’s President, Willy Brandt and requested by Robert McNamara who at the time was President of the World Bank.
Step 2
What was the 1986 Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste Treaty with Canada. North-South regional integration. Excerpt – recognizing international law in connection with environmental issues:
REAFFIRMING Principle 21 of the 1972 Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, adopted at Stockholm, which asserts that states have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to exploit their won resources pursuant to their own environmental policies and the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other states or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction;
Definitions:
For the purpose of this Agreement: (a) “Designated Authority” means, in the case of the United States of America, the Environmental Protection Agency and in the case of Canada, the Department of the Environment.
Step 3
NAFTA Agreement (Excerpt) – North-South regional integration
Preamble
BUILD on their respective rights and obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and other multilateral and bilateral instruments of cooperation.
Article 101: Establishment of the Free Trade Area The Parties to this Agreement, Consistent with Article XXIV of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, hereby establish a free trade area;
…
Article 104: Relation to Environmental and Conservation Agreements
1. In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the specific trade obligations set out in:
(a) the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, done at Washington, March 3, 1973, as amended June 22, 1979,
(b) the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, done at Montreal, September 16, 1987, as amended June 29, 1990,
(c) the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, done at Basel, March 22, 1989, on its entry into force for Canada, Mexico and the United States, or
(d) the agreements set out in Annex 104.1,
such obligations shall prevail to the extent of the inconsistency, provided that where a Party has a choice among equally effective and reasonably available means of complying with such obligations, the Party chooses the alternative that is the least inconsistent with the other provisions of this Agreement.
2. The Parties may agree in writing to modify Annex 104.1 to include any amendment to an agreement referred to in paragraph 1, and any other environmental or conservation agreement.
Annex 104.1
Bilateral and Other Environmental and Conservation Agreements
1. The Agreement Between the Government of Canada and the Government of the United States of America Concerning the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste, signed at Ottawa, October 28, 1986.
2. The Agreement Between the United States of America and the United Mexican States on Cooperation for the Protection and Improvement of the Environment in the Border Area, signed at La Paz, Baja California Sur, August 14, 1983.
Step 4
The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal was the link for the bilateral and trilateral environmental agreements to come under the authority of international law in a step-by-step strategy of turning our government into merely a puppet regime of an international system of environmental law directed by international communists of the United Nations – aided and abetted by their U.S. embedded counterparts.
The U.S. Senate ratified the Basel Convention in 1992. The retention of sovereign rights domestically was meaningless because of the design and structure of the EPA and CEQ through the implementation of NEPA. By way of example:
When the NAFTA Agreement was passed by Congress in 1993, what that did was to consolidate the La Paz Treaty with Mexico and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer and the Basel Convention for international law jurisdiction to complete the hangman’s noose for the American system of government.
In 1994, the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) was formed. The Council is the CEC’s governing body and is composed of the highest level environmental authorities (cabinet level or equivalent) from Canada, Mexico, and the United States. The Council oversees the implementation of the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) and serves as a forum for the discussion of environmental matters within the scope of the Agreement.
The CEC is an intergovernmental organization located in Montreal, Quebec. The charter for them is the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation. It’s not clear that the Congress ever voted on it – or that it would be necessary for them to vote on it because the authority for it was in the La Paz Treaty – and NAFTA agreement. Excerpts:
PREAMBLE
The Government of Canada, the Government of the United Mexican States and the Government of the United States of America:
RECOGNIZING the interrelationship of their environments;
ACKNOWLEDGING the growing economic and social links between them, including the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA);
RECONFIRMING the importance of the environmental goals and objectives of the NAFTA, including enhanced levels of environmental protection;
EMPHASIZING the importance of public participation in conserving, protecting and enhancing the environment;
REAFFIRMING the Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment of 1972 and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development of 1992;
Notice the last clause – REAFFIRMING the Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment of 1972 and the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development of 1992;
If you’ve been following along – understanding the content of the agreements from the La Paz Treaty forward, you should be able to see that the CEC is the real government in the shadows and the people who present themselves as representing the American government are impostors working as puppets in a puppet regime.
North-South
International Law for the Environment
In 1981, the United Nations Environment Programme held their first conference to discuss the mechanisms to building a body of international environmental law. The meeting was held in Montevideo, Uruguay. In 1982, the program developed in 1981 was adopted by the Governing Council of UNEP and it became known as the Montevideo Programme. They followed the pattern established at the first conference to meet every ten years – followed by a meeting in the next year to adopt the body of international law written in the previous ten years. Adoption meetings occurred in 1992 in Rio de Janiero and 2002 in Johannasburg, South Africa. They appear to have changed the schedule for the Fourth Montevideo conference. It was held in 2009 and Montevideo IV was adopted in 2010.
Excerpt from Montevideo II – “In order to further elaborate the Montevideo Programme to address emerging environmental problems and develop relevant legal regimes, UNEP convened two sessions of the Meeting of Senior Government Officials Expert in Environmental Law for the Review of the Montevideo Programme in Rio de Janiero in October/November 1991 and in Nairobi in September 1992 respectively. Through the two sessions, government experts from more than 80 developing countries and developed countries and observers from relevant organizations attended the meeting. Participants of the latter session of the meeting, taking into account the outcome of UNCED, in particular Agenda 21, considered a draft Programme prepared by the UNEP secretariat and agreed on the Programme for the Development and Periodic Review of Environmental Law for the Present decade.”
Note: the links were changed so the originals were retrieved from the Internet archive. If you go to the UNEP website and search, you will find information on the Montevideo Programme.
UN Archive on Environmental Law (note: each bullet point is a hyperlink – they just didn’t give you a clue to that fact)
2 Comments
Kristin
Guys- I read a book by T. Marrs “Hillary Clinton Big Sister Is Watching You” published way back in 1993. While I don’t agree with Marrs on plenty of things, I do like how he’s described the socio-fascist plot of the government, at the time of writing it was the Clintons: Stealing people’s land claiming it’s to protect the sacred environment. . Using environmentalism as a political cover. Hillary said we need to “rethink what it means to be a human” ummm.. as opposed to what exactly. She means, she wants us to think “community”. Every time you hear the word “community”, or, another UN favorite euphemism: “village”, replace it with the word “State”. It takes a STATE to raise a child. Anyway, Marrs calls it the “New World Order” I call it the UN’s global system plan. He writes about the Rio “Earth Summit” in 92, which was to map out the plan to do a massive P.R. campaign to re-educate the mass mind. They set up the World (conservation) Bank, using US taxpayers money to grab title to millions of acres of wilderness lands around the globe, especially USA (like the Bundy Ranch hello). His (Marrs) audience is esoteric to the Christian believers in the rapture theory, which unfortunately will turn away most people, anyway my point is not a review of this book but the fact this information has been around a while, and the public is JUST getting whiffs of it here and there, because they believe the news. Well, they KIND of believe the news, that is, they think they are given the facts with a spin, all they have to do is try to ignore the “spin” part so they can figure out the real story for themselves. They CAN’T figure it out, because they are lied to about all of it.
This whole SILENT COUP D’ETAT (stole that phrase from Vicky) is a perfect example of the US Govt which needs another coup d’etat by the people, the people who should perform their duty to protect the Constitution of the United States. On “Democracy in America”, which is acted out in a series of radio plays on Archive.org (which see) in one episode These fourteen, thirty-minute episodes follow Tocqueville and his companion, Gustave de Beaumont, from their landing in New York in May of 1831 through their departure nine months later, with the final episode twenty years later. The series is an educational one, produced Division of General Education of New York University in conjunction with the Fund for Adult Education https://archive.org/details/OTRR_Democracy_In_America_Singles
Highly entertaining, in one episode I fondly recall has Alexis, his character a French tourist, asks a stranger on the street “where is your army?” (as was in France, the military were the police for the people at the time) the man answers him: ” the people are armed. We have a right- No, a duty, to be armed, to protect ourselves and our compatriots from enemies foreign and domestic” Not just a right, a duty!
It is OUR duty to bring these examples of treason to attention to the people. Vicky Davis is the best example I have yet to see of an American patriot. I have heard the word patriot bandied about, and then thought it rather cornball, but I am using the word in it’s best definition. She is bringing very important information to the public’s eye, it needs to be addressed, talked about.
Do not buy into the Communist admonition that one “must not discuss politics or religion”. Nice way of controlling people so they can’t bring about any changes. We must talk about it. Talk about it! Talk about it with family, co-workers, with friends. We must *not* tolerate the intolerable, you know. that is another word they’ve stolen from us- “tolerate” a word which meant put up with something you don’t like, but the people think it means accept anything no matter how bizarre or repulsive. We shall not tolerate bad behavior, nor should we repeat the bozo hippy mantra “live and let live”.
Those UN people really are wolves in sheep’s clothing. They make all these loving kind claims, and use words like “humanitarianism” and “Woman’s Health” and “equality” but if you read what they are doing it is exactly the opposite. Woman’s health is abortion and birth “control”. “Village” is globalism. Humanitarian acts is bringing in slave labor and stealing from citizens to feed those slaves.
Vicky
Thank you Kristin for recognizing what I do. My reward is when you share it with others. Waking people up is exponential.