Word Games for Treason in the Open

The vocabulary word of the day is regime.   In news reports on war activities in the Middle East, the term regime change has been used giving the impression of toppling governments as they did with Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and for the last several years, the attempt to take out Assad from Syria.

A couple of days ago, I encountered a new term that puts a whole new light on the American government and the perpetual war that is being waged in our names.  The term is  regime theory.   Given that there was a theory associated with the word regime, I thought I should look it up.  It turns out that when the media is talking about regimes, they are talking about definition 2a:

One of the search results for the term regime theory was a powerpoint.  The first slide defines regime theory:

Slide 21 gives an examples of regimes –

The name of the agreement for participation in the World Trade Organization was the Marrakesh Agreement.  The legislation: H.R. 5110 passed by the House on November 29, 1994 and by the Senate on December 1, 1994.  It signed by Clinton on December 8, 1994 becoming Public Law 103-465.

So, we now know that the WTO is a regime that is the regulatory body that governs international trade.  By extension, the way the international economy has been structured with the United States being the buyer for goods produced in all the third world countries – including India and China, the WTO rules over our economy by extension of the rules that govern international trade.    So when the Congress passed H.R. 5110, they were transferring sovereignty over our economy to an international body – an international regime, a regulatory authority called the WTO.

So now that we understand what a regime is, we can look at the Five Eyes Pact.  An article on CNN’s website asks that very question in the following article:

In that article, you can see the evolution of an agreement between two countries during war time to a global regime that not only includes many countries but has also reached down into those countries to include local law enforcement in the intelligence sharing regime.   It should be noted that the national security state was created in 1947 with the National Security Act of 1947.  That legislation created the regime of national security behind a curtain of secrecy in the U.S.

On September 9, 2014, the Guardian published an article titled,  ‘Five Eyes’ surveillance pact should be published, Strasbourg court told

On February 6, 2015, the Guardian reported, UK-US surveillance regime was unlawful ‘for seven years’

There are other articles but the point is that the intelligence community right down to our local law enforcement were and are part of an international regime that governs their activities – NOT THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES.  That has to be true because it’s the only possible explanation for the behavior of the FBI and Department of Justice relative to the Congress and the people of the United States.  Information collection where there is no crime and parallel construction using that information to bring down a political adversary would not be the activity of an American law enforcement agency.   An American law enforcement agency would consider anybody who did those things as an enemy of the state.

Recall when Trump took office and appointed Jeff Sessions to be the Attorney General.  Sessions immediately recused himself because he was allegedly under investigation for lying about exchanging a few pleasantries with a Russian Ambassador at a conference.   That obviously was a ruse but the recusal allowed Rod Rosenstein to become the Acting Attorney General for the alleged Russian collusion investigation setting up a dual management system within the Department of Justice – one Acting Attorney General for an international investigation and one appointed Attorney General for everything else – domestic.

The Russian collusion story is garbage and by now only people with IQs under 100 don’t know it.  So why is Robert Mueller still there?   And what is he really doing?     Is he actually leading an insurgency – the international security regime embedded within our government?   That would make sense given that he became the Director of the FBI days before 9-11.   And according to James Comey at an Intelligence Summit held in 2014, Mueller was the guy who worked with Maureen Baginski, Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA) to set up the “intelligence network” to include the Department of Justice and all law enforcement right down to the local cop on the beat with the other leg of it being the Judges, courts, court personnel, etc.   It was a complete capture of our system of justice all enabled by the events of 9-11 for which no investigation was done and nobody was prosecuted.

It seems to this writer that we need to start looking at the “government” through the lens of regime rather than making an assumption that the people who represent themselves to be government employees are really American government employees.  In other words, are they American government employees or are they representatives of an international regime?

The question of who is really running our government considering the blatant and un-American activities that we see everyday is more important than merely a passing curiosity.   The system as it appears operates like an invasion of the body snatchers – Americans being thrown out – replaced by internationalists who are destroying the country and waging war on American citizens from within the government itself.

The following is a link to a video of James Comey talking about the FBI as an intelligence agency.  Listen carefully to what he says with consideration for the meaning of regime: