In Al Gore’s 1992 book, Earth in the Balance in the chapter titled A New Common Purpose, Gore wrote:
“Adopting a central organizing principle—one agreed to voluntarily—means embarking on an all-out effort to use every policy and program, every law and institution, every treaty and alliance, in short, every means to halt the destruction of the environment and to preserve and nurture our ecological system.”
In the next chapter, titled A Global Marshall Plan, Gore talks about the post-World War II Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe (financed by the American people) and then he proposed a global version to re-build The Third World countries “to help impoverished nations achieve a stable population and a new pattern of sustainable economic progress” by allocating the money for transferring “environmentally helpful technologies” to them. He continues,
“To work, however, any such effort will also require wealthy nations to make a transition themselves that will be in some ways more wrenching than that of the Third World. Opposition to change is therefore strong, but this transition can and must occur—both in the developed and developing world. And when it does, it will likely be within a framework of global agreements that obligate all nations to act in concert.”
The end of the Cold War and the re-unification of Germany were the starting guns for these grandiose and delusional ideas. In a 1992 speech to the United Nations titled Forging a Genuine Global Community, George Herbert Walker Bush said,
“Imperial communism may have been vanquished but that does not end the challenges of our age—challenges that must be overcome…we face the common economic challenge of promoting prosperity for all, of strengthening an open, growth-oriented, free-market international economic order while safeguarding the environment.
The speech that George HW Bush, Communist-in-Chief, gave to the United Nations that day is too important not to read in its entirety because he set the agenda for the nightmare that we are all living through to this very day which is a different form of communism. It’s communism through scientific dictatorship hiding behind the politicians embedded within the government manifesting itself through the administrative-regulatory systems of government. George Bush’s speech may be read as it was given HERE. A highlighted version HERE.
Using climate change as a symbolic replacement for global communism in the United States seems to have begun in 1990 with the passage of The Global Change Research Act of 1990 which became Public Law 101-606. According to the history that was posted on the Global Change Research Information Office (GCRIO) website, the purpose of this legislation was:
. . . to require the establishment of a United States Global Change Research Program aimed at understanding and responding to global change, including the cumulative effects of human activities and natural processes on the environment, to promote discussions towards international protocols in global change research, and for other purposes.
Under Title II (International Cooperation in Global Change Research) of the Act, Section 204 requires that a Global Change Research Information Office (GCRIO) be established. The stated purpose of the GCRIO is:
. . . to disseminate to foreign governments, businesses, and institutions, as well as citizens of foreign countries, scientific research information available in the United States which would be useful in preventing, mitigating, or adapting to the effects of global change.
“Global Change” is a global term that encompasses everything. If your mind is thinking in terms of the doctrine of radical environmentalism, you would think they are talking about global climate change – but it doesn’t say that. It just says global change. And it’s not rocket science to know that changing the organization of nation-states – dissolving and replacing them with regional, international “governance”, changing the foundational beliefs of people – reverting to a primitive system of earth worship – protecting the earth as the sole purpose for living, transferring wealth to other countries while managing the decline in their own standard of living, and changing the behaviors of people that were developed and shaped by the history, systems of government and societies in which they live would cause a few problems that would require some study and some very clever propaganda that explains to people why their world is being turned upside down.
Also in 1990, a movement began among college and university leaders following a conference to discuss the role of universities in environmental management and sustainable development. The conference was held at Tufts European Center University in Talloires, France. It was funded by grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, the EPA, and the John D. and Catherine T. Macarthur Foundation and it featured Maurice Strong as the keynote speaker. At the time, Maurice Strong was the Secretary General of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development which was to be held at Rio, Brazil in 1992. From the history page of the Association of University Leaders for a Sustainable Future (USLF):
Assisted by internationally respected environmental leaders, the presidents explored the state of the natural environment, the impact of human population growth and economic activity on the environment, and strategies for the future.
The presidents discussed the role of education, research, policy formation, and information exchange in managing human impact on the environment. Since the majority of the presidents were from developing countries, concerns about resource depletion, poverty, and the need for substantial assistance from developed countries received equal attention with local, regional, and global pollution problems.
The output of the conference was the Talloires Declaration that had ten points with the tenth point being:
10) Maintain the Movement
Establish a Secretariat and a steering committee to continue this momentum, and to inform and support each other’s efforts in carrying out this declaration.
The USLF was formed as the Secretariat for signatories to the Talloires Declaration which was the final push for a global scientific dictatorship – a global conspiracy for a global technocratic tyranny.
Science & Technology Policy
On April 21, 2017, John P. Holdren, Director of Obama’s White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and longest-serving Science Advisor to the President in the history of the position (dating back to World War II) gave an address to the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). His purpose was to talk to them about Trump’s proposed budget cuts for the scientific dictatorship that has metastasized within the government.
At the beginning of his address, he said he was no longer constrained in what he says because he no longer works for government. It’s a good thing for us because he explained the organizational structure that constitutes the technocratic tyranny. I took a brief clip from his address, but you should really listen to his entire presentation – several times so that you digest the how the scientific dictatorship within our government operates.
What Holdren had to say was so intriguing, that I went back to the C-Span archives to see if there were other videos with him speaking. There was one in July of 1991. In that one however, there were equally interesting things being said by others in a hearing of the House Science Committee on global climate change – keeping in mind that the United Nations Rio Conference that produced Agenda 21 did not happen until 1992. I took two clips of it but it’s worth watching the whole thing – or just the second panel which begins at 2:27 into the program if you have limited time.
In the first video, we find out where the pressure came from to adopt the global climate change BS. Also, the House Member Scherer is very anxious to throw our national sovereignty out the window and to recognize global common law as it was under the British system.
In the second video, an economist talks about the “Redistribution of Rights” which is a very, very clever way of not saying redistribution of wealth – but that’s what the result is. And I say “is” because when you put together the Talloires Declaration – a union of universities agreeing to indoctrinate students into “sustainable development” which is really radical environmentalism combined with a doctrine of redistribution of rights, I think you produce the Marxist social justice warriors who are demanding their own destruction.
On Saturday April 22, 2017, a day after John P. Holdren gave his address to the AAAS because of proposed budget cuts to the scientific dictatorship embedded within our government, a March for Science event was held in Washington DC. Don’t miss it.
9 Comments
Joe
The chorus of people and organizations screaming bloody murder that Trump pulled out of the Paris accord/treaty and the right pretends like nothing happened that might be good for the country. Both parties are way left of where they should be, I am glad that we are out of Paris, but are we really?
Vicky Davis
It sounded like it at first, but then he contradicted himself. He’s willing to renegotiate it. The fact is that climate change as a function of the weather is a fraud – period, end of story.
“Global Change” is a symbolic term that has a dual meaning. Based on my research, what it really refers to is the end of the Cold War with the Soviet Union and the anticipated societal changes as capitalism and communism merged. They talk about it in terms of a weather phenomenon because the interchangeability of the terms works really well to keep the discussion above the heads of the peasants.
Wsky
Joe and Vicky You are the insane that this article implies. Anyone who grew up without air conditioning can clearly understand that it is getting hotter. Anyone that grew up near lakes can see they are disappearing. Anyone who has left the HOUSE and gone to other COUNTRIES can see seas are rising, beaches and islands are disappearing and glaciers are disappearing. ANYONE With so much as a THERMOMETER on their AUTOMOBILE who has driven from the country to the city and witness the rise in temperature can understand anthropogenic climatic warming. It is NOT complicated for people with ANY EXPERIENCE in life and common sense.
As far as the article goes, the author writes, “Gore talks about the post-World War II Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe (financed by the American people)”
Everyone can remember that it was the British that financed the reparations of Europe the debt of which they paid off by 2007. https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Britain_makes_final_World_War_II_debt_payments Britain is still paying debt on WWI. This is how I knew that whatever I read after this statement would be pure nonsense.
Vicky
The people who fabricated the “climate change monster” were counting on your ignorance and superstition. It is the proverbial monster under the bed. If we do as they say, they will save us from the monster. I haven’t been a child for a long time so I’m not afraid of monsters under the bed.
There are two definitions of the word climate – one pertains the weather in general terms such as a warmer climate around the equator. The other definition definition pertains to feelings such as the climate in the room was icy. A writer can write as if they are talking about one definition – the weather while what they are really talking about is the other – feelings. To know the difference requires that you understand the context and the perspective and interests of the writer. “Climate change” as a function of the weather is a highly useful and profitable tool for manipulation of people and because of that, it’s a useful tool for collectivization of the society – conversion to a communist, collectivist system for fun and profit (snide remark).
I did grow up in a house without air conditioning. The span of time in your life or my life is too little to measure anything in terms of global change. You put your ignorance (as in un-educated) on full display with that statement. Tides come in and tides go out. That has to do with earth dynamics – gravity and the rotation of earth. The tides are generally associated with the moon because they are cyclical – there is a rhythm to them. It’s not always on the same – sometimes the tides are high than a previous high time.. sometimes its lower than a previous low tide. It’s the nature and dynamics of the earth itself and not anything that mankind is doing. Exception would of course be man-made islands and fill in harbors.
As far as the water is concerned, I do believe inland bodies of water are being stolen. Water is the new blue gold. They extract water like they extract oil and ship it out via pipelines so that nobody sees what they are doing.
As far as your comment concerning the Marshall Plan, you need to do some reading of history and you need to work on your logic. If a country is paying debts… it means they borrowed money. If you have to borrow money, you can’t lend money because you are a borrower – not a lender. Both wars cost Britain a lot of money. They didn’t have the money to rebuild their country and Europe. It’s just that simple.
Peter
But also as far as I remember, Britain forgave Germany its war debt.
Peter
ClimateChangeElevatesCarbonDioxide.
Too much atmospheric carbon?
Burn more coal !
Because more is less you see
Warming the globe
Warming winters
Requiring less heating
Saving electricity
Burning less black coal
Yielding less carbon – not tax !
But less is more you’ll see.
Thereby cooling the globe
Freezing the winters
Necessitating more heating
Using more electricity
Burning more solid coal
Creating more aero carbon – and tax.
I ask you again : –
– Too much atmospheric carbon ?
Then burn more coal !
Create more gaseous carbon – and tax.
Warm the globe
Cause hot summers
Requiring air conditioning
Excessive electricity
Costing a quid (dollars)
Burning even more coal
Creating more gaseous carbon
Getting something from nothing
Namely, Hocus Pocus – more tax !
Causing hotter summers
Asking yet more air conditionng
Using even more electricity
Costing even more money
Sending us broke
Burning ever more coal
Creating more carbon – and tax !
Thereby heating the globe
Melting the ice caps
Gillard in ‘hot water’ (Australian PM)
Bulging upward and outward
Displaced is the sea level rise
Splash invading these shores
Politically laundering inaugural :
– Splash Invasion Day –
One ‘Australia Day’ whenever.
Fish lured to floats
High seas – literally ‘up there’
Ascending Kosciusko (highest peak)
Backing up rivers and creeks
Backing up sewerage
Into Parliament House
Overflowing to the chamber
Gillard in deep shit
Flushed with embarrassment.
Abbot’s Ark refloated (Opposition Ldr)
Gillard left behind – panting
Hot air over Canberra,
That waste of breath emitting
– Three greenhouse gases –
CO2, water vapour and methane
Ensuring piping hot summers
Despite high altitude clime
Using endless air conditionng
Requiring loads more power
Burning loads more coal
Now mined under sea
Creating more carbon – and tax !
Bringing scorching summers
Evaporated ice caps
Relentless air conditioning
Massive power consumption
Turning cheap cheap coal
Into cost prohibitive power
Stretching resources
Sending us out backward
Borrowing more money
Giving it away overseas (Indonesia)
Paying it back also
After the debt still remains
Sending us all to the wall
Compounding taxed tax (GST)
With interest on interest
Burning heaps more coal
As of yet mined in Australia
Trying to stay cool
Turning alchemic coal
From element to energy.
A long sought transmutation.
Energy to tame heat extremes
CO2 fine, to kill the luxury
Yielding carbon dioxide – and tax.
Thus warming the globe
Deemed ‘climate change’
A pro-Babylonian dogma –
Confronted rightly by Galileo
Purporting anti-Babylonian fact :
– Earth orbits the sun
Alternating the seasons
Reversing temperature extremes.
Causing warmer winters
Lowering heating bills
Saving us money – not tax !
Depleting electrical generation
By burning less coal
Yielding less carbon – not tax
But less is more you’ll see.
Thereby cooling the globe
Expanding the ice caps
Shrinking sea levels.
Scared fish donning atmo-gills
Brave fish clutching sinkers
Icy cold winters
Demanding more heating
Using plenty of electricity
From cheap burning coal
Creating more Carbon gas – and tax.
I ask you again : –
– Too much carbon gas ?
Then burn more solid coal !
Because more is less you see
Warming the globe
Making us comfortable
Warm toasty winters
Necessitating less heating
Saving electricity
Burning less coal
Yielding less carbon – not tax !
Thereby cooling the globe
Chilling the winters
Making us bloody miserable
Frightening brass monkies
Freezing the ice caps
Beseeching more warmth
Using more friendly power
Burning carbon rich coal
Eking something from nothing
Enabling more carbonic gas
And rabbit out of a hat
Abra cadabra – tax.
There you have it :
Climate change causes carbon dioxide
Not the other way round.
Likewise Professor Flannery’s bullshit
Exhales flatulent Methane
Emitted out of his cakehole
And not the other way round.
And he towels it with serviettes
Instead of toilet paper.
That too is the wrong way round.
Time to get it right Flannery.
Peter
Climate change causes carbon. Carbon does not cause climate change. The cart is before the horse. The tail wags the dog.
When it is cold, coal is burnt to create electricity for heating. The coal burnt forms CO2. The atmosphere heats. When it is hot, coal is burnt to create electricity for air conditioning, again forming CO2. The atmosphere cools. The process repeats heating and cooling, global warming and cooling – harmonious equilibrium. Therefore CO2 is caused by hot weather and cold weather extremes caused by winter and summer. Climate Change Misconstructs therefore need to alter their strategy and press to eliminate the seasons, not eliminate coal. The tail does not wag the dog.
But eliminating coal generated electricity would solve nothing – it would not eliminate the seasons which is impossible anyway. That would be akin to the egg laying the chicken, when quite obviously the chicken laid the egg. Akin to putting the cart before the horse. A case of “If my aunt had balls she’d be my uncle.”
Some say, “The boid is on the wing” but that’s absoid. Everybody knows the wing is on the boid.
A well oiled bicycle has become a well boiled icicle. Totally absurd.
Peter
When I can find it, I intend to place a long script on global warming from an Australian point of view. Unfortunately I’ll have to type it all again. Maybe I can photograph and then copy it.
Peter
ClimateChangeElevatesCarbonDioxideLevel
Too much atmospheric carbon?
Burn more coal !
Because more is less you see
Warming the globe
Warming winters
Requiring less heating
Saving electricity
Burning less black coal
Yielding less carbon – not tax !
But less is more you’ll see.
Thereby cooling the globe
Freezing the winters
Necessitating more heating
Using more electricity
Burning more solid coal
Creating more aero carbon – and tax.
I ask you again : –
– Too much atmospheric carbon ?
Then burn more coal !
Create more gaseous carbon – and tax.
Warm the globe
Cause hot summers
Requiring air conditioning
Excessive electricity
Costing a quid (dollars)
Burning even more coal
Creating more gaseous carbon
Getting something from nothing
Namely, Hocus Pocus – more tax !
Causing hotter summers
Asking yet more air conditionng
Using even more electricity
Costing even more money
Sending us broke
Burning ever more coal
Creating more carbon – and tax !
Thereby heating the globe
Melting the ice caps
Gillard in ‘hot water’ (Australian PM)
Bulging upward and outward
Displaced is the sea level rise
Splash invading these shores
Politically laundering inaugural :
– Splash Invasion Day –
One ‘Australia Day’ whenever.
Fish lured to floats
High seas – literally ‘up there’
Ascending Kosciusko (highest peak)
Backing up rivers and creeks
Backing up sewerage
Into Parliament House
Overflowing to the chamber
Gillard in deep shit
Flushed with embarrassment.
Abbot’s Ark refloated (Opposition Ldr)
Gillard left behind – panting
Hot air over Canberra,
That waste of breath emitting
– Three greenhouse gases –
CO2, water vapour and methane
Ensuring piping hot summers
Despite high altitude clime
Using endless air conditionng
Requiring loads more power
Burning loads more coal
Now mined under sea
Creating more carbon – and tax !
Bringing scorching summers
Evaporated ice caps
Relentless air conditioning
Massive power consumption
Turning cheap cheap coal
Into cost prohibitive power
Stretching resources
Sending us out backward
Borrowing more money
Giving it away overseas (Indonesia)
Paying it back also
After the debt still remains
Sending us all to the wall
Compounding taxed tax (GST)
With interest on interest
Burning heaps more coal
As of yet mined in Australia
Trying to stay cool
Turning alchemic coal
From element to energy.
A long sought transmutation.
Energy to tame heat extremes
CO2 fine, to kill the luxury
Yielding carbon dioxide – and tax.
Thus warming the globe
Deemed ‘climate change’
A pro-Babylonian dogma –
Confronted rightly by Galileo
Purporting anti-Babylonian fact :
– Earth orbits the sun
Alternating the seasons
Reversing temperature extremes.
Causing warmer winters
Lowering heating bills
Saving us money – not tax !
Depleting electrical generation
By burning less coal
Yielding less carbon – not tax
But less is more you’ll see.
Thereby cooling the globe
Expanding the ice caps
Shrinking sea levels.
Scared fish donning atmo-gills
Brave fish clutching sinkers
Icy cold winters
Demanding more heating
Using plenty of electricity
From cheap burning coal
Creating more Carbon gas – and tax.
I ask you again : –
– Too much carbon gas ?
Then burn more solid coal !
Because more is less you see
Warming the globe
Making us comfortable
Warm toasty winters
Necessitating less heating
Saving electricity
Burning less coal
Yielding less carbon – not tax !
Thereby cooling the globe
Chilling the winters
Making us bloody miserable
Frightening brass monkies
Freezing the ice caps
Beseeching more warmth
Using more friendly power
Burning carbon rich coal
Eking something from nothing
Enabling more carbonic gas
And rabbit out of a hat
Abra cadabra – tax.
There you have it :
Climate change causes carbon dioxide
Not the other way round.
Likewise Professor Flannery’s bullshit
Exhales flatulent Methane
Emitted out of his cakehole
And not the other way round.
And he towels it with serviettes
Instead of toilet paper.
That too is the wrong way round.
Time to get it right Flannery.