In 2004, Thomas P.M. Barnett gave a presentation at the Industrial War College titled, Military in the 21st Century that was broadcast on C-Span. The audience naturally was military and Pentagon people. He was there to talk about the concepts in a book he wrote titled The Pentagon’s New Map. In the book, he divided the world into the Old Core, the New Core and the GAP. In his view of the world, the Old Core was the United States and other western nations – the G7 countries. The New Core was the so-called emerging countries – India, Brazil, China and the GAP was the least developed countries like the Middle East and most of Africa.
What struck this writer and completely captured my attention was the scope and scale of the ‘grand strategy’ he was presenting. It was a bizarre combination of strategic planning for Wall Street and the military that spelled the destruction of the United States as I knew it. The cognitive dissonance was so great I spent the next three months transcribing his presentation – every word of it. I had no words to write about it because it was too big so I did this webpage: Shattered Worlds instead. Notice at the bottom there are four concepts three of which were directly from Barnett. The last one was implicit in what he was saying.
What Barnett gave in his presentation was strategic thinking for the ostensible purpose of securing an American future that destroys America in the process. Kill it to save it. If it was intentional, then he was a traitor. If not, then he went off the deep end and was completely insane. No other options were possible. Since he was a defense analyst who was hired immediately after 9-11 for the Office of Force Transformation, he was feeding back the input he got from other powerful sources and those powerful sources arranged for him to speak to military people so he had to be taken seriously.
In the presentation, Barnett introduced a term that was new to me at least: War in the Context of Everything Else. That was a horrifying thought – stealth warfare on an unsuspecting civilian population and the population being targeted was the United States.
Barnett’s presentation provided me with the trailhead for much of my research and guideposts ever since. Recently as more and more details of this so-called refugee crisis have come to light, Barnett’s words still ring in my ears…. Is it the west versus the rest or is it the best versus the rest? That’s a more inclusive redefinition of Hitler’s master race concept. Another critical message from Barnett was that, there are four flows that are crucial to globalization. Resources in regions where they are plentiful must migrate to where they are scarce. The four flows are people, energy, money – foreign direct investment, equity ownership and the export of security.
I took a clip from Barnett’s presentation so that you could hear him explain the flows of people – from the GAP to the Old Core. He included the New Core – but not so much. When you hear it from him, you should understand that this so-called refugee crisis is not a refugee crisis. They are playing you for a sucker. It’s actually a strategic plan to redistribute populations from the least developed countries to the developed countries. Since the least developed countries are also the countries that are primarily Muslim countries that have been living in a world not much more progressive than the 7th century, it has to be considered a strategic plan for the occupation and take down of the United States. That’s why these so-called “refugees” are military-aged young men.
The following clip is also from the Barnett presentation. In this one he talks about a consolidated global military/police force with a four-star general at the top.
Barnett’s presentation is long – about 2 hours and 40 minutes but it is THE program to watch if you want to understand what is happening to our country.
The Pentagon’s New Map: Powerpoint Presentation
C-Span Broadcast, June 2, 2004
The Military in the 21st Century
Thomas P. M. Barnett
Program ID: 182105-1
Category: Public Affairs Event
Date Aired: September 4, 2004
This writing needs a bit more of an audience. Any way I can spread it around I shall. Again brilliant and it’s not mere speculation or subjective opinion, its documented and researched very well. As I’ve written to Ms Davis before, I’d not seen such research from any private person outside the State Dept.
I needed to know the truth of things for myself and I share what I find with anyone who cares to read it. Your support for my work means a lot to me. Thank you so much.
Ms Davis I’m flattered you consider my opinion worthy even meaning of meaning.
PS – for any 9-11 truthers, I think Vicky Davis just released the reason behind it, and its in this “Military in the 21st Century” transcript, with your notes to help (it would have been tedious without them, and less understandable for the less mentally gifted, like one of your readers cough cough)
There are SO many things that caught my eye in this, and one of them was interesting in that it reminded me of Dr Lawrence Dunegan’s speech to pediatricians he recollected from memory “…there will be no martyrs…” In that man Barnett said in (pdf)
The Top 100 Rules of the New American Way of War” it’s states :”What the United States Mobilizes and Takes to Any War
32. Any war the United States wages involves all elements of national power, meaning
the United States works to defeat its enemy in every way possible:
· Destroying their ability to wage war
· Isolating them from potential allies
· Denying them resources
· Denying them the sympathy of others.”<<<< right there. When I read the propaganda in any news media outlet I pay attention to the emotional response I get from the stories- if they are gearing a certain person or group for mockery, contempt or sympathy. With that "DENY THEM SYMPATHY" my mind went back to the CIA's "changing hearts and minds" and to Dr Dunegan's tapes about "there will be no martyrs"
(Dunegan is a physician, who made these tapes in the 1980s? from a recollection he had from a speech that took place in the 1960s given by a Dr Day his audio recollection and interview is AVAILABLE on Archive.org, or you can read a transcript http://www.sweetliberty.org/nobarbarians3.htm#.VlPpzMlsHtQ there was another parallel about being able to technologically pinpoint exactly where a person is:
(from the transcript)" the advances in technology and how they could spot just one little individual down in… they used the constant reference to pinpoint… "pinpoint". I imagine with the different technologies they can also pinpoint a couple of renegades in the New World Order. The technology which was applicable to a so- called 'enemy' can also be applicable to this controlling the order."
Now, this Dr Dunegan taped recollection is nowhere near the level of even one page of Vicky Davis research, but the Dunegan tapes is a nutshell, and a condensed and easily digested/fun read (like how a horror film is fun)
everything in that speech warning us about future plans has or is occurring, I first read one part about "TVs watching you" years ago. He also mentions quite a bit about global money, global communities,
As of right now, it is late and again I find myself lost in a miasma of ChannelingReality work I haven't seen before, and again I can imagine many hours and days lost to reading. For the readers, the way Ms Davis writes is really remarkable, instead of tiring one it energizes one to read the pages. I can't imagine even putting even just ONE page of hers together, it takes me many minutes composing a comment on a website let alone those "books" of information and research- now I am talking about a mere single page on her site, every one a gem full of nuggets (confusing mental picture I know) it's stunning really.
Barnett talked about a division in the military – two forces: (1) Leviathan (2) System Administration. In the IT business, the System Administrator is the person responsible for the systems (computer) which is what grabbed my attention in the first place. Something I caught this time that I didn’t the previous 5 or 6 times was that he talked about coalition partners for the Sys. Admin force. He said: “A lot of gap countries prefer to do this” and the UN is paying them. Those systems of the Sys. Admin. force would include the critical infrastructure systems. Those systems are like a loaded gun to the head of public officials. That gives the UN something similar to a hand grenade with the Sys. Admin. Force having it’s hand on the pin.